After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are reviving these kinds of systems. Via lie diagnosis tools tested at the border to a program for confirming documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of solutions is being applied to asylum applications. This article is exploring just how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers are transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unforeseen tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs all their capacity to find the way these systems and to pursue their right for safety.
It also displays how these technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering these people from being able to access the programs of safeguards. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms of technologies, through which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects who have are regimented by their dependence on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article states that these technology have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double effect: even though they aid to expedite the asylum process, they also generate it difficult with respect to refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions manufactured by non-governmental celebrities, and www.ascella-llc.com/ ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their situations. Moreover, they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.